This would in reality not be a problem with so it framework; Sir John de Keith d

Re: ? Comyn wife regarding Malise

Concerning the Comyn child who had been wife off Malise out of Strathearn, I’d theorized from inside the 2005 one to she was Margaret, defined as wife out of Sir John de- Keith (look for copy out of blog post less than) who had been 2ndly e are given in this post: this new spouse Emma I recommend try of some other family unit members, rather than mommy of one’s next Earl Malise.

Scots Peerage, sub _Comyn, Earl out-of Buchan_ , states in eastmeeteast avregistrering part, ‘Malise, Earl of Strathearn, got a wife Emma, inside the 1261-1267, whose surname is unknown ‘[SP II:256, cites Cal. regarding Docs., i. 2383, 2451]. a little while in advance of 1270, to ensure their widow (Margaret) could have been “available” some time once Emma.

It was without a doubt a speculation; it does feel the advantageous asset of coping with a well-known matchmaking between Muriel Keith and Reginald ce Cheyne. Any more relevant documentation would without a doubt end up being enjoy.

This new account inside Scots Peerage regarding the class of Keith says away from Sir John de Keith (d. california. 1270) that he is actually said to features partnered Comyn, earl away from Buchan . That it identity, of one’s undecided (“said to was in fact”) diversity, are now able to become remedied in line with the pursuing the dispensation, old at Fondi towards fourteen The month of january 1378/9::

‘ Reg Aven 215, fifty With the bishop regarding Moray. Professors so you can dispense Reginald Cheyn, donzel, and you will Murielle, damselle, d de- Keth, out of Moray and you can Aberdeen dioceses, throughout the obstacle to help you wedding as a result of the next and next quantities of consanguinity. Fondi, 19 Kal. Feb., anno step one. SRO Vat. Trans., iv, no. 46. ‘

Muriel Keith, the future second partner away from Robert Stewart, initially Duke out of Albany (d. 1420), is actually contracted to help you marry Reginald ce Cheyne, young man out-of Sir Reginald ce Cheyne by his partner (once the her basic spouse), Helen out-of Strathearn. When you find yourself you will find well known gaps about origins out-of Muriel Keith, she and Reginald ce Cheyne manage show an origin from the Comyns. Yet not, that is also distant to need a good dispensation in the event that Muriel try a good-great-high grandd Comyn, Earl off Buchan (d. 1233), which could become circumstances if ‘s the reason child.

dos. Reginald ce Cheyne try a great-grandson away from Marjory Comyn, daughter regarding Alexander Comyn, Earl out-of Buchan (d. 1290), young man away from William Comyn in the above list. Her young man was Malise, Earl regarding Strathearn off 1312 to his passing when you look at the 1328 , and daddy regarding Reginald.

ca. 1270), is actually just like Marjory Comyn, and partnered 2ndly to Malise, Earl out-of Strathearn (d. 1312). This would suggest this new parentage a€?said to have been’ that Margaret, wife out of Sir John de- Keith, was off you to age bracket: she’d not have come the new d Comyn, Earl of Buchan, but alternatively out-of their son Alexander. There is absolutely no proof that Earl Malise and Marjory Comyn had been hitched much in advance of 1275: since the Lindsay blogged,

Discover you to discernable basis on what the partnership ranging from Reginald le Cheyne and you can Muriel Keith will have lived: if the Margaret Comyn, wife away from Sir John de Keith (d

‘ The new spouse of this earl, regarding the 1275, try entitled Marjory, as we see the attesting clause away from No. curriculum vitae., that is mentioned from the Wyntoun, Book VIII. guy. vi., for started the second cousin from John Comyn, Earl from Buchan, just who discussed with respect to Earl Malise the wedding payment more than stated [old within London, April 26, 1293 having their daughter Matilda and you will Robert de- Tony, child regarding Ralph].’

Alexander Comyn = E de Quincy E off Buchan We __________________I________________ We III 1) Sir John = Marjory = 2) Malise de Keith We (als We Age away from Strathearn . 1270 We Margaret) I d. 1312 _____________I__ ___I__________________________ We We We I I I Sir William Bernard Malise Gilbert Robert Maud de- Keith de- Keith Age off = Robert d. bef 1293 Strathearn; d. 1328 de Tony I ______I_______________________ We We We We Sir Edward Malise Mary Helen = Isabella de Age regarding Strathearn = 1) Sir Reginald Synton d. california. 1343 I le Cheyne I We I = 2) Sir David We V I I de Graham Sir William de We I__________ Keith I I = Margaret Fraser __________________I_______ V __I_____________ We I We III I I I I Muriel + Reginald Mary Mariota Keith ce Cheyne (= Robert Stewart, Duke from Albany)